| Home. | Universe Galaxies And Stars Archives. | 
Universe Galaxies Stars logo.
     | Universe | Big Bang | Galaxies | Stars | Solar System | Planets | Hubble Telescope | NASA | Search Engine |

The Red Planet: Mars. New Theory.


Ten Years Since The Revolution at Amazon.

SAS Black Ops at Amazon.
Amazon Kindle EBook Reader: Click For More Information.

mars.
Awesome New Theory. Before you fall off your seat laughing at the prospect of Martians living on the red planet mars, or life on Mars as we might call it, read the whole theory here, and you'll see it's not quite as daft as it first sounds.

Theory by PM Crowley Strict Copyright   Applies. All Rights Reserved.

In the two other papers on this web site, the solar vortex and planetary evolution I show candidly how it's possible to reinvent our view of the solar system, turn it into a hot fused vortex and construct a model for planetary evolution based entirely on expanding the accretion theory, unlike the current scientific theory which argues, we just got lucky, we were in the right place at the right time.

The only problem with a Martain theory appears to be the Planets are out of sync. The running order needs to be slightly rearranged to bring the hypothesis to a more prosperous conclusion. And quite surprisingly, this is easier to achieve than I ever believed possible.

Rather than say our star, the Sun, is a globular burning ball of gas as science does, I chose a more radical new approach. I converted the star sun into a hot solar vortex, what we might term, a fused black hole. I wanted to create a natural, solar, fission related engine built on the propagation of stellar material. The thinking behind this action was to construct an engine with regulatory temperatures, and the power to extend its gravitational influence farther than the Sun does at present. If I could achieve this, our star, or any other in the universe, once ignited would permit our Sun to constantly fluctuate at given juncture in its history.

Depending on the volume of material the Sun would consume at different periods during its turbulent life, would allow for increased and decreased levels of gravitational influence throughout the solar system. By producing this hypothesis, I developed a cyclical system of production, and thus allowed heat from the said body to construct debris, asteroids, comets and moons within the Solar System itself.

In the paper planetary evolution I took the model a logical step farther and demonstrated the unique nature of early refinement, and showed how to mould Planets purely by using temperature alone. The heat application of the Sun would act as a catalyst to drive the atomic reaction and weight displacement of particle matter, distribute it, and allow lighter gases such as hydrogen, helium and oxygen to rise at a much faster rate than carbon. This carboniferous effect would structure the embryonic shell so need for the fuller development of solidified planetary land. Or what we mIght term, a solid surface.

With this in mind, an embryonic planet formed of loose, clumped together material will participate in an evolutionary process of any Solar System and produce a weight distribution and maintain a system of balanced forces, thus a mature Solar System will follow on as surely as night follows day.

As rocks and other space debris consolidates through gravitational influence, it must naturally scoop residue gases and form a planetary proposition similar to what we witness today on the solar system's periphery: Neptune and Uranus would be classical examples of such an early endeavour. These are Planets with a very small iron core, and shrouded in gaseous material. Imagine a core the size of an average family saloon car, with a thick blanket of gas around it, maybe ten, twenty, thirty times the size of Earth.

What we need to do now, is refine these gases down to an atmosphere and create solid land mass with an ability to sustain and support life as we know it. It might sound difficult to postulate such theory, but nothing could be further from the truth.

In fact the theory is so elegantly simple, the prospect of it becomes frighteningly obvious once examined more closely. Basically all we're about to do is build a filtration system, convert surrounding gas into a stable environment and produce life from the waste material. It becomes no more than a chain reaction where over the hundreds of millions of years a planet purifies itself. No different from dirty water passing through rock formation to emerge after the osmosis period as crystal clear spring water with all the impurities removed.

As the Sun extends its mighty power throughout the solar system, gases around the said planet find their own value. A bit like a child releasing a helium filled balloon and watching it race away into the sky. If you momentarily picture in your mind not one helium balloon, but billions of them, you should visualise a more obvious recognition of what's about to take place. The balloons are lighter than the gas surrounding them, therefore they find a higher value within atmospheric conditions. If you still have problems visualising such an event, think how a large, over populated city looks on a smoggy day. As the temperature climbs, lighter gases rise faster than heavy gases, and so carbon lays low to the ground. One day's smog doesn't make much difference, or effect the planet to any great extent, but think what 500 or 600 hundred million years of it would do. How high would the carbon be? As high as mountains?

As our Sun continuously heats up and cools down, heats up and cools down, this refinement of gases slowly builds a shell around the core of the newly forming planet, until eventually the core grows to the size of an average planet, maybe significantly bigger. We might even say the newly formed planet is several times the size of the earth, only the surface of it will not yet contain solid landmass, but more a quagmire of living vegetation.

The skies above will be made up of violent weather patterns and the climatical temperatures reach greenhouse like conditions. In fact the surface temperature could well be' in the high 70s or 80s Celsius, with winds blasting at 200 or 300 hundred miles an hour. All over the surface volcanic activity would be rife, and the early process of evolution accelerated to thousands of times it normal speed, which in itself would throw chronology into disarray. To visualise this happening, think of a stove in your kitchen with four pans on it, each pan contains the same elementary amount of water and cabbage. We begin to heat each pan at a different temperature and allow the water to slowly burn off.

No doubt you've worked out that the pan with the most heat underneath it dries out quicker than the ones with less heat. Therefore, on a cosmological basis we can make an assumption, that although Planets farthest from the Sun might be considered to gain less influence, the star's power might cause them to develop less quickly.

However, nothing could be farther from the truth. For like the pans on the stove, if we placed a lid on the pan with less heat, it would naturally boil quicker than the one with more heat. The paradox being, atmospheric gases would create heat retention. This led me to believe, Planets with higher surface temperature spin at a greater velocity on their axis, in conjunction to those with a lower surface temperature, and thus they create a higher volume of mass.

Yet all planets, regardless of their distance from the star, must fall with an equal ration once the star loses its productive power. But equally as the planet falls, so must the particle gases surrounding the planet.

And so what we see is a steady application of planetary movement where the planet is taking positive, progressional steps towards the star, as the star reclaims the material it violently distributed among the early Solar System during its initial explosive period at the birth of the solar system.

If we understand then, that the productive cycle of Planets is anything other than by accident, that there is progressional movement of Planets back to the place of their birth, based on the fluctuation of stars period temperature, we should also understand that every star in the heavens will have a planetary Solar System with advanced and embryonic life around it. The rewrite of Einsteinian special relativity will explain why we do not currently detect those said Planets via doppler registration.

If this is the case, that our star, the sun, and every other star in the universe has elementary life around it. we must consider the fact our planet Earth is not the first planet in the sequence of events.

Other Planets would have gone before us. And it's this which brings me to the possibility of a Martian civilisation. Not a primordial Martian soup with basic life in the very kindling of development, but a highly intelligent species possibly hundreds of thousands of years more advanced than ourselves.

We currently view the Planets of our Solar System running like this: The Sun, Mercury, Venus, the Earth, Mars, the asteroid belt and then the superior outer planets.

Let's suppose they haven't always ran in this sequence.

Let's suppose they evolved in an evolutionary way.

If they did, they would run like this: The Sun, Mercury, Mars, The Earth, the asteroid belt, and the the superior planets. You might have noticed a significant change, Venus is missing from the second list, and Mars and the Earth have shifted position. Mars is now in front of the Earth. How could this be?

What I said was Venus was once a Jovian moon, probably a sister Moon of Io, and at some given juncture during its history its shifted position, plunged through the solar system, caught the natural gravitational field as its passed between Mars and the Earth, and force both Planets to turn inside-out. but what evidence is there for this? Well, if we look closely at the surface of Venus we see the crater construction contains an ubiquity, which in itself demonstrates the planet hasn't been there that long. If it ha been there as long as other bodies in the region, then the crater construction should theoretically show a disparity. It doesn't. Also, the Greek monk Evagrious wrote in his journal of a period in the 6th century, 542ad to be precise: The Sun has turned a bluish colour and we marvel to feel its wanton might wasted into feebleness. Something fairly calamitous hit the Earth during this period without any logical explanation. Crops failed, people starved, stable Dynasty's fell apart. Disease was rampant and the whole planet experienced turmoil.

If as Evagrious says, the Sun turned a bluish colour, one can assume some form of brimstone passed by changing atmospheric conditions. I believe Venus's heavy sulphurous atmosphere is responsible. However, the bigger question is, did it fall, or was it pushed?

It might be nice to believe that Venus transcended the solar system, passed between the Earth and Mars and dragged them inside-out purely by accident. But in all honesty, the mathematical chances of this happening are negligible. I think we have to assume the Moon planet Venus was given a helping hand. If we view Jupiter today you can still see the trace element of where the detonation of a huge thermonuclear explosion would have take place as a large red tempest swirling around.

If we could take a sample from this region I'm pretty certain we would find traces of cezium, the left-over deposit of a nuclear explosion to prove the theory accurate.

At this point we have to ask why an advanced Martian species would wish to pursue such an action? It goes like this: Any advanced civilisation would have worked out that the evolutionary nature of their planet would be slowly eroded. The oxygen around them would be rapidly running out.

Therefore they would face two options, one, accept the inevitability of it all and call it a day. Accept their species will perish once the atmosphere reaches a point where the sun's radiation will break through the ozone layer, or two, look for a new planet.

The Martian population must have viewed our beautiful green world with very envious eyes indeed, although they'd face one huge problem: the atmospheric conditions. As their respiratory system would have honed and adapted itself to the Martian environment, planet earth's atmosphere would contain too much carbon for the to breathe.

Quite simply it would poison them, therefore they would need to precipitate evolution on earth. My guess is, when Venus shifted through the Solar System turned Mars and the Earth inside-out, Venus itself would have been meant to continue on to the Sun, fused with it and sent a massive heat expansion throughout the solar system. This would have diluted our atmosphere and allowed a subterranean Martian population to move down here.

  Go Forward  Go Back  Mars Facts



  Go To Print Article  



Universe - Galaxies and Stars: Links and Contacts

the web this site
 | GNU License | Contact | Copyright | WebMaster | Terms | Disclaimer | Top Of Page. |